|
|---|
Sunday, October 5, 2008
On November 4th a very important vote is coming to San Francisco. It's called "Yes on H" and if it passes, this is what it will do:
Specifically, the Act directs the City to analyze, identify and pursue strategies that:
Maximize greenhouse reductions from the electricity sector at the minimum cost including the following clean energy mandates: by 2012 ensure at least 107 megawatts; by 2017 ensure 51%; and by 2030 ensure 75%. The SFPUC shall ensure that 100% or the greatest amount technologically feasible or practicable are met through clean energy by 2040. Nuclear is prohibited from being included in the definition of clean energy.
Investigate ways to improve electric service and reduce costs to customers, including through measures such as Community Choice Aggregation.
Establish an Independent Ratepayer Advocate to represent the interests of ratepayers and ensure affordable and reliable service.
Develop a Green Jobs plan providing workforce development for clean energy, construction and operations in PUC jurisdiction. Any PG&E employees who become City employees as a result of this Act will not suffer any reduction of compensation or seniority.
Evaluate the financial and environmental benefits of locally controlled electricity services, including renewable energy and energy efficiency. This includes a cost-benefit analysis of municipalizing the electric system, as well as shorter-term measures such as Community Choice Aggregation.
Seems like a no-brainer, and it is. One problem is that SF Mayor Gavin Newsom's not behind it, and no one seems to have a good reason why, including Mayor Newsom. Not a good idea for someone running for Governor of California.
Labels: CLEAN ENERGY, oakland, San Francisco
0 Comments:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
LinkWithin
